Union Mill & Min. Co. v. Ferris
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
Bill in equity to restrain the diversion of water.
1Opinion of the Court
HILLYER, District Judge.
This suit was commenced on the fourth day of August, 1871, to enjoin the defendant from an alleged wrongful diversion of water from Carson river. Albert Ferris having since the commencement of the suit acquired the interest of Peter Lightle, one of the original defendants, has been substituted as a defendant. Lightle answered separately, and the present decision involves only the-questions at issue between the complainant and the defendant Albert Ferris. This is one among several causes instituted by the complainant against numerous residents along the Carson river, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rhodes v. WhiteheadTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Vansickle v. HainesNevada Supreme Court · 1872
- Kidd v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Arnold v. FootNew York Supreme Court · 1834
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
- Bowman v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Howell v. JohnsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.