Legal Opinion

Rose v. Eclipse Carbonating Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The Eclipse Carbonating Company is a corporation whose affairs were managed by a board of three directors, consisting of' the plaintiff and of the defendants Dolph and Judge, who at the same time were the stockholders of the corporation. Controversies arose between the plaintiff and the defendants as'to the' management of the affairs of the corporation, and the plaintiff applied for the appointment of a receiver. The circuit court, on September 22, 1893, appointed a receiver, who duly qualified on *29September 28. The effects of the corporation were sold under the order of the court, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis Gaslight Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Ward v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Bennett v. St. Louis Car Roofing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Boogher v. Maryland Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Mathews v. DanahyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Austin v. ShipmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Bell v. Peper Tobacco Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Morris v. Z. T. Briggs Photographic Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Foster Woolen Co. v. WollmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API