Legal Opinion

Bitkowski v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1987No. 86-1839PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) appeals from a district court order which denied Merrill Lynch’s motion to compel arbitration of a controversy with its customer, plaintiff-appellee Eunice Bitkow-ski, pursuant to an arbitration provision in a customer agreement signed by Bitkow-ski. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the district court’s order.

In October 1981 Bitkowski opened seven accounts with Merrill Lynch through its agent, Thomas Henson, on her own behalf and that of her minor children. At the meeting she executed customer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. K.N. Bhatia, M.D. v. S. Erik JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Disner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Manning v. Interfuture Trading, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. CSA-Credit Solutions of America, Inc. v. SchaferDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
  4. Eunice K. Bitkowski v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API