Legal Opinion

Walton v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1939No. 44028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

Defendant demurs to plaintiff’s petition generally on the ground that it does not state a cause of action. Plaintiff is a retired warrant officer of the Army and signs himself “Major, *29U. S. A. retired.” The War Department addresses him as “Warrant Officer Joseph H. Walton.”

The claim is based upon the act of July 31, 1935, 49 Stat. 505,507, stating that “any officer of the Regular Army * * * whose application for retirement under the provisions of this section” has been approved by the President shall be retired in the grade of major, etc. The Special Orders of the War Department specifically…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jakway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  2. Barmore Duncan, Steven A. Gardner, Edward Y. Hall, Harvey W. Riley, Walter W. Welch, III and Roger Winslow v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API