Legal Opinion
McConaughy v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 22, 1993No. Civ. A. WN-91-2874PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys Fees. Paper No. 13. The government has opposed the motion (Paper No. 15), Plaintiffs have replied (Paper No. 16), and both parties have submitted supplemental memoranda in response to the Court’s requests for additional information. The Court held a hearing on the motion on July 1, 1993. Upon a review of the pleadings, the applicable case law, and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the Court determines that Plaintiffs’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Pl…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- John W. Bode and Toni Bode v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Sam Ellis Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1991
- Kenlin Industries, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Bayer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Hope Services v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- New Hope Services, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002