Ex Parte Stewart
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
786 So.2d 464 (2000)
Ex parte Hugh STEWART.
Ex parte Kameron Hyde.
(Re Hugh Stewart v. The Birmingham News Company; and Kameron Hyde v. The Birmingham News Company).
1990418 and 1990419.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 22, 2000.
Order Overruling Applications for Rehearing December 1, 2000.
Leah O. Taylor of Taylor & Taylor, Birmingham (rehearing brief filed by Leah O. Taylor and Rhonda Pitts Chambers of Taylor & Taylor, Birmingham), for petitioners.
James P. Pewitt of Johnston, Barton, Proctor & Powell, L.L.P., Birmingham, for respondent.
2Per curiam 1
Hugh Stewart and Kameron Hyde, the plaintiffs in actions…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Houston; Concurrence · Cook; Per curiam 2; Concurrence · Houston.
3Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. FontenotSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- ARONOV REALTY BROKERAGE INC. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Birmingham News Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- The Birmingham News Company v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.