Legal Opinion

DiMarco v. Bombard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered October 2, 2009 (66 AD3d 1341 [2009]) is amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of the memorandum: “Even assuming, arguendo, that the affidavit of plaintiffs attorney, which purports to outline the terms of the stipulation, constitutes a sufficient record upon which we may review plaintiffs contention that the court erred in vacating the settlement agreement, we would nevertheless affirm.” Present—Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caughill v. CaughillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Stanley v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Caughill v. CaughillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Yaghi v. CatalanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011