Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thomas Jefferson Classical Acad. Charter Sch. v. Cleveland Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 2015No. 15-464Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBryant, Judge

I concur in the majority opinion affirming the trial court's findings and conclusions regarding the restricted or nonrestricted nature of certain funds; however, I dissent from the majority's holding that the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law support its determination that "indirect costs" and "E-rate" funds are nonrestricted.

Indirect Costs

The majority opinion holds that the trial court did not err in finding and concluding that "indirect costs," which are a percentage of the total federal grant funding that pays for the operating expenses incurred by the school system to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy Charter School v. Cleveland County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API