Legal Opinion
Zarranz v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1950No. 13099_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Brought under the export control laws, Title 22 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq., the libel of information was for the forfeiture of an automobile which had been properly seized and was being held under warrant in ac*651cordance with the precise terms of the statute.1
Denying the allegation that the persons named were exporting and intending to export, and attempting to ship the automobile through the port of Brownsville without complying with the provisions of the Act of July 2, 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 701, the claimants, Zarranz and Abasólo, prayed that the libel be dismissed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Paul AjlounyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. One 1985 Mercedes-Benz, 300 Sd, Vin Wdbcb20c6fa177831, and Sadrudin Kabani, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. One Boeing 707 Aircraft, Etc., Servotech International EstablishmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Zarranz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950