Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Merced Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1925No. Civ. No. 2932Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the intervener from an order striking out all the items of his memorandum of costs. The facts are in all respects the same in principle as those in Danley v. Merced Irr. Dist., ante, p. 58 [243 Pac. 676].

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the order is reversed and the trial court is directed to hear and determine the questions raised by respondents’ motion to tax costs in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

A petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Danley v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API