Amann v. Pantages
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered March 20, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.
Pantages, of Seattle, proprietor of a vaudeville circuit on the Pacific Coast, had at New York one Louis Pincus, who, both on his office door and in his stationery, described himself as “representative” of this circuit, and who engaged the actors Amann for performances to begin about three months later at Calgary. A written contract bore Pantages’ name by this representative. The opening was then postponed by Pincus some ten days, and from Calgary to Spokane, after doing which he departed to Europe, while *272the Amanns, according to agreement, delivered their players’ effects to his office.
Waitin…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nielsen v. Northeastern Siberian Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hannifin v. Retail Clerks International Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- Hannifin v. Retail Clerks International Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1973