Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Empire Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. Otero Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 16, 1982No. 81SA30Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDubofsky, Justice
I concur with the majority opinion except for Part III-B, from which, respectfully, I dissent.
The majority position in Part III-B is grounded on the proposition that the Governor’s authority to prescribe the matters for legislative action must be interpreted so as not to offend the doctrine of separation of powers. CoIo.Const. Art. Ill provides:
“The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments — the legislative, executive and judicial; and no person or collection of persons charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- People v. LarkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- In Re Interrogatories of the Senate Concerning Constitutionality of House Bill No. 45.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934