Mathews v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Gonzales. Tried below before tbe Hon. Wesley Ogden. • , Tbe opinion of tbe court gives a full statement of tbe material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
Appellant assigns for error the following: Eirst—The court erred in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment, for the reasons stated in the motion. Second—The court erred in refusing to consider the motion for a new trial after the motion in arrest of judgment. Third—The - court erred in refusing to grant the motion for a new trial for the reasons stated in the motion.
The indictment in this case intends to charge the offense of swindling, under Art. 2426 of the Criminal Code.
We are of opinion it should have been framed upon Art. 2105. *105and should have charged the defendant with an attempt…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Washington v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Hall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Alden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.