Legal Opinion
Horvath v. Patterson
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Separate motions are made by the two groups of respondents, the New York City Transit Authority and the New York City Civil Service Commission, to dismiss the petition as failing to state a cause of action as against each group. The petitioners allege that certain action taken by the Transit Authority involving suspension of their individual members for periods of from five to seven days and probation for periods of six months each was illegal.
The proceeding is an outgrowth of a situation which arose In this city on October 3, 1955 when a substantial number of *961motormen who operate the city…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Schwab v. McElligottNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Greenfield v. MosesNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Matter of Tiernan v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Greenfield v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- People ex rel. Tyng v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horvath v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957