Legal Opinion

Bridge Properties, Inc. v. Securitas Realty Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 16, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtKahn, J.

Motion to vacate taxation of costs is granted. Upon removal to this court the action became a City Court action. As the order allowing removal did not provide for Municipal Court costs there is no basis for taxing such costs. The costs here involved are statutory, and there is no room for the exercise, of discretion. Therefore, I cannot agree with the decision in Saraceno v. Eastern Cab Co., Inc. (168 Misc. 631). (See Gwizdak v. Netherland Cab Co., 51 N. Y. S. 2d 560, and cases there cited.)

The sum of $79.75, costs taxed as aforesaid, .will be credited upon the judgment and upon any execution…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saraceno v. Eastern Cab Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API