Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Luttrull

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 21, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00011Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION VICTOR EARL THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 1:21-CV-011-HAB-SLC JAMES D. LUTTRULL JR, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Victor Earl Thompson, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API