Legal Opinion
General Shale Products Corp. v. Struck Const. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1942No. 9113PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, circuit judge.
Claiming that appellees had violated the Robinson-Patman Act, Sec. 13, Title 15, U.S.C.A. by destroying appellant’s competition in the sale of building materials, General Shale Products Corporation brought suit for triple damages. After a pre-trial hearing, the district court entered an order dismissing the case, from which appeal is taken. For brevity, appellant will hereafter be referred to as the Shale Company, and appellees, as the Struck Company and the Southern Company.
A brief review of the facts is required for an understanding of the contentions of the…
2Cited by40 opinions
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Ass'n, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aviation Specialties, Inc. v. United Technologies Corporation, Pratt-Whitney Aircraft of Canada, Ltd., and Airwork Division of Pacific Airmotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- May Department Store v. Graphic Process Company, and Bel-Aire & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rangen, Inc., a Corporation, Buhl Feed & Ice Company, a Corporation, and Elwood D. Grimes v. Sterling Nelson & Sons, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.