Robertson v. Ætna Ins.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentSmith, C. J.
Three of us are of the opinion that the decree of the court below is erroneous and should be reversed; this cannot be done, however, unless a majority should concur therein; consequently, the decree must be affirmed.
*408In order to more clearly state the views of myself and the two of my Associates who concur therein, I will restate the case as made by the record. This cause does not arise on an original bill, but on a petition filed in the cause in which the decree sought to be reopened was rendered. As that was a cause in equity I presume that the power which the court below could here exercise…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Wilson v. Town of HandsboroMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Brown v. WessonMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Webster v. SkipwithMississippi Supreme Court · 1853
- Miller v. PalmerMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.