Bean v. Bachelder
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
ON REPORT. Writ of entry, dated March 15, 1881, to recover possession of lot number four, range three, in Greenfield. Plea, general issue. The opinion states the facts. cited: Rand v. Skillin, 63 Maine, 103 ; Small v. Procter, 15 Mass. 498; Poignard v. Smith, 6 Pick. 178; Overfield v. Christie, 7 Serg. and It. 177; Blandía,rd v. Chapman, 7 Maine, 122; Johnstone v. Scott, 11 Mich. 232 ; Patterson v. Stoddard, 47 Maine, 355 ; Proprietors of.
Read the full summary
ON REPORT. Writ of entry, dated March 15, 1881, to recover possession of lot number four, range three, in Greenfield. Plea, general issue. The opinion states the facts. cited: Rand v. Skillin, 63 Maine, 103 ; Small v. Procter, 15 Mass. 498; Poignard v. Smith, 6 Pick. 178; Overfield v. Christie, 7 Serg. and It. 177; Blandía,rd v. Chapman, 7 Maine, 122; Johnstone v. Scott, 11 Mich. 232 ; Patterson v. Stoddard, 47 Maine, 355 ; Proprietors of. Kennebec Parchase v. Laboree, 2 Greenl. 281; Powers v. Patten, 71 Maine, 585 ; Brotvn v. Allen, 43 Maine, 590; Patterson v. Doe, 8 Blackf. 238; Hitchings…
1Opinion of the CourtDaNfoetii, J.
This is an action to recover possession of lot numbered four in range three, in the town of Greenfield. The plaintiff claims under a deed of warranty from William T. Garland, dated November 15, 1880, under which he went into possession of the demanded premises. Garland claimed title by prescription.
The defendant claims title under a deed from S. and J. Adams, dated March 11, 1881, under which he took possession, disseiz-ing the plaintiff. This title is traced through intervening conveyances to that of Appleton and Hill, who, it is admitted, became the owners of this and many other lots in…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Vandall v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889