Legal Opinion
In re Quoc Thai Pham
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 2011No. B228821PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
Appellant Matthew Cate, as Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, appeals from the trial court’s November 1, 2010 order staying enforcement of Penal Code section 3003.5, subdivision (b) as to all registered sex offenders on active parole in Los Angeles County pending the resolution of petitions seeking a writ of habeas corpus that had been previously filed. In issuing the order, the court concluded that enforcement of the statute led to the virtual banishment of those parolees from Los Angeles County and thus the statute was unconstitutional. We find…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Doe v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Menis v. NDEx West CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- P. v. Bennett CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013