Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 21, 1990No. 88-5056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

On April 30, 1990, the grand jury for the Southern District of Florida issued a new subpoena identical to the subpoena that gave rise to this case. Appellee has fully complied with the new subpoena.

Appellee now moves to dismiss this appeal as moot, and appellant joins in the motion. The panel opinion, published at 896 F.2d 1267, has already been vacated by our order of May 16,1990, granting rehearing en banc. The panel opinion will remain vacated, the judgment of the district court, 717 F.Supp. 1502, is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena for Attorney Representing Criminal Jose Evaristo Reyes-RequenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings 89-10 (Mia)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. MoodyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API