Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Inman

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 20, 2003No. 13-02-415-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice GARZA.

DaimlerChrysler Corporation has filed and argued an interlocutory appeal with this Court challenging the trial court’s certification of two nationwide classes for purposes of suing DaimlerChrysler on claims arising out of its design, manufacture, marketing, and sale of automobiles equipped with defective seatbelts. On appeal, DaimlerChrysler argues that the certification orders must be reversed. We reverse and remand.

Background

The plaintiffs are owners of Daimler-Chrysler automobiles equipped with Gen-3 seatbelt buckles, which they allege suffer from a design…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. InmanTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Labrado v. County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  5. Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API