Floyd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentDavidson, Judge
The offense denounced by Art. 95, P.C., is one in the nature of theft and embezzlement in that it makes unlawful the fraudulent taking of the property of another.
The indictment in this case contained multiple counts charging the fraudulent taking by appellant of a house, and the lumber of which it was constructed, which belonged to the City of Houston and which *530had come into his custody by virtue of his being an officer or employee of an officer of said. city.
From those counts, the trial court submitted to the jury, by the following instruction, one offense as one transaction:
"Now, if you…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Loftis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Stoddard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Walles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Ritter v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.