Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Rubin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 1989No. 89-2078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Judge.

Property owners Herman Cohen and New Sunrise Investment Corporation appeal nonfinal orders appointing a receiver for real property in which the appellee, Sandra Rubin, owns a 50% interest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii).

There is ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s decision to appoint a receiver under the facts of this case, where a prior judgment had established that the property was fraudulently conveyed by the appellants. See Fleming v. Otis Elevator Co., 107 Fla. 557, 145 So. 201 (Fla.1933).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Fleming v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rescom Investment, Inc. v. Strategic Consulting & Managing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Dana Entertainment, Inc. v. Tucan & Baru Brickell, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API