Legal Opinion

Carr v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1984No. Docket 71203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Does the employer’s duty to accommodate, as set forth in the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq., extend only to persons whose *228handicap "is unrelated to the individual’s ability to perform the duties of a particular job”, or does it extend to persons whose handicap is related to the particular job unless it is demonstrated that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship? On April 22, 1983, the trial court held that the obligation extended only where the handicap was unrelated to the employee’s ability to perform the job in question and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Shelby Township Fire Department v. ShieldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Dady v. Rochester School BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Armstrong v. Senior Citizens Housing of Ann Arbor, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Carr v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API