Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to section 309 of the Surrogate’s Court Act a referee will be appointed to take further testimony in this proceeding. The testimony presents a close issue of fact as to whether or not Morton Rosenberg was a partner with his deceased father, Charles Rosenberg. Additional testimony is desired by the court to aid it in determining this issue of fact. Evidence concerning income tax returns made by Morton Rosenberg, individually and as executor of the estate, was improperly excluded. In 1917 there was an affirmative duty on a partnership to file a statement for the purpose of fixing the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puzich v. PappasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. LipoffNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API