Messmer v. Block
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: G-so. E. SutheelAND, Judge. To the point that the complaint was sufficient, they cited Edlemcm v. Kidd, 65 Wis. 22; Bliss, Code FI. §§ 9, 152, 156; Fa/rron v. /Sherwood, 17 N. Y. 230; Humst v. Litchfield, 39 id. 377; Mosley v. Blade, 28 id. 438; Mead v. Degol/yer, 16 Wend. 638; Ciarle v. FaAr-child, 22 id. 583; 1 Chitty, PL 352, 353; 2 Ency. of Forms, 298; Pa/rleer v. Macomber, Í6 L. E. A. 861; Allen v.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: G-so. E. SutheelAND, Judge. To the point that the complaint was sufficient, they cited Edlemcm v. Kidd, 65 Wis. 22; Bliss, Code FI. §§ 9, 152, 156; Fa/rron v. /Sherwood, 17 N. Y. 230; Humst v. Litchfield, 39 id. 377; Mosley v. Blade, 28 id. 438; Mead v. Degol/yer, 16 Wend. 638; Ciarle v. FaAr-child, 22 id. 583; 1 Chitty, PL 352, 353; 2 Ency. of Forms, 298; Pa/rleer v. Macomber, Í6 L. E. A. 861; Allen v. Patterson, 7 N. Y. 476; Keteltas v. Myers, 19 id. 231; Bue v. Ketchum, 51 Wis. 324.
1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to a complaint alleging, in effect, that the plaintiffs were at the times stated architects; that as such, and between April 1, 1896, and September 11, 1896, they, at *665the special instance and request of the defendant, rendered and performed wort, labor, and services in and about the drawing of plans and specifications for use in the erection and construction, and which actually were used in the erection and construction, of the building described, and the superintending of such construction, and that the same was situated on the real…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Farron v. . SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Edleman v. KiddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Steckmesser v. GrahamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Silverthorn v. WylieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Danielson v. Garage Equipment Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913