Legal Opinion

In re Lyall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 13, 1997No. 24700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent admits he has committed misconduct and consents to a suspension of up to nine months. We accept respondent’s admissions and suspend him from the practice of law for nine months.

Padgett Trust Matter

Respondent and his wife served as co-trustees of a trust established on behalf of their children by respondent’s father-in-law, Christian D. Padgett. In the past several years, Mr. Padgett would forward appropriate documents to respondent and his wife, request their endorsement as co-trustees, and have them return the documents to Mr. Padgett for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. In re BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In re LyallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API