Legal Opinion
Burlingame v. G & G Auto Repair
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 22, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), entered July 6, 1995, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination of the same court granting the motion of the defendant Slezak for a mistrial and, in effect, setting aside the jury’s verdict on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant Slezak only, and (2) an order of the same court, entered November I, 1995, as, upon reargument, adhered to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Rush v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Manchester v. Bankhead Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Sakin v. FrymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Knapp v. Fulton County National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- Panzarino v. WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Johnson v. LazarowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Staltare v. D & B Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Our Lady of Wisdom Regional SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Panzarino v. WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999