Legal Opinion

Willis C. Washington v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 8, 1956No. 18-1162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Under an indictment containing two counts appellant was convicted of unlawful entry, a violation of § 22-1801, D. C.Code, 1951, first count, and of possession of implements of crime, namely, two *358crowbars, a violation of § 22-3601, D.C. Code, 1951, second count.

In Benton v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C.—, 232 F.2d 341, recently decided, we have held section 22-3601 to be unconstitutional in its application to such tools as are here involved. The conviction on the second count of the indictment, therefore, cannot be affirmed. With respect, however, to the unlawful entry count, we find no error…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Moss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Allen Benton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. JeffriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  4. John B. Monroe v. United States of America, George C. Prather v. United States of America, Roger W. Simkins v. United States of America, Curtis M. Taylor v. United States of America, Albert H. Smith v. United States of America, Charles Anderson v. United States of America, Burnie King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API