Legal Opinion

Akhtar v. Santos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On a motion for summary judgment, the defendant has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; Matthews v Cupie Transp. Corp., 302 AD2d 566, 567 [2003]). In this case, the orthopedist who examined the injured plaintiff on behalf of the defendant found restrictions in the range of motion of the plaintiffs cervical and lumbar spines and left shoulder five years after the accident. Accordingly, the defendant failed to meet her initial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Matthews v. Cupie Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Swaby v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodgers v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API