Legal Opinion
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 8, 2014No. Case No.: 12-CV-00630-LHKPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW •
[PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION]
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
On May 5, 2014, after a thirteen-day trial and approximately four days of deliberation, a jury in this patent case reached a verdict. ECF No. 1884. On May 23, 2014, Apple filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, amended judgment, new trial, and damages enhancements. ECF No. 1897-3 (“Mot.”). On June 6, 2014, Samsung filed an opposition. ECF No. 1906 (“Opp’n”). On June 13, 2014, Apple filed a reply. ECF No. 1919 (“Reply”). The Court…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Techtronic Indus. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Finjan, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Kaneka Corp. v. SKC Kolon PI, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.