Legal Opinion

Langan v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

The defendants have moved pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, and in the alternative for judgment in favor of the defendants for the relief requested in the answer.

The action is brought by the plaintiffs for a declaratory judgment determining that an assessment made by the commissioner of finance of the City of Syracuse, New York, against the real property of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Strusburgh v. . Mayor, Etc., City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Lewis v. City of LockportNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Security Building and Loan Association v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cedzich v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API