Zaragosa v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of sexual assault of a child. Punishment was set at ten years in the Texas Department of Corrections. The trial court’s charge to the jury included the instruction on the law of parole prescribed by Tex.Code Crim.Proc. Ann. art. 37.07, § 4 (Vernon Supp.1986). Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the instructions on parole violated the separation of powers doctrine of the Texas Constitution. Tex. Const, art. II, § 1.
Appellant’s sole authority for his contention is Rose v. State, No. 5-85-1136-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas, August 11, 1986).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Corley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Patton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Casares v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- M.A.B., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lugo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Mathews v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Beaver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Anthony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Garza Barreda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.