Legal Opinion

Gramigna v. Board of Ministerial Pensions & Relief of United Presbyterian Church of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1938No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises the issue whether a principal who delivered a bond and mortgage executed in blank, together with settlement papers similarly executed, to his agent entrusted with all of the negotiations to procure a loan is bound by the delivery of the mortgage and the payment of the mortgage money to the agent, notwithstanding the agent’s misappropriation of that money. “Where one of two innocent persons must suffer loss by reason of the fraud of another, the loss must fall on him by whose act the wrongdoer has been enabled to commit the fraud”: Mielcuszny v. Rosol, 317 Pa. 91,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Just v. Sons of Italy HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Demharter v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Weiner v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Denver v. SharplessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Time Sales Finance Corp. v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API