Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania R. v. Stegaman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1927No. 4639PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error recovered a judgment on account of the death of his intestate, his minor son, under the circumstances described in our opinion in this ease upon a former appeal (6 F.[2d] 873) and involved in the Overholt Cases (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 1021.
Upon the trial there was substantial evidence that the statutory warnings by whistle and bell were not given. Hence there was a ease for the jury upon the issue of the railroad’s negligence.
We are unable to see that, assuming there was negligence by the railroad, the conduct of the bus driver in failing to observe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Erie R. v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Baltimore & OR Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Baltimore & O. R. v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Kline v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Hugh Breeding, Inc., a Corporation, Hugh Breeding, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Levorne Glinsey, Adm'x v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania R. v. ShindledeckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Kilmer v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Strider v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.