Legal Opinion
Sorci v. General Motors Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1983No. 46863PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNahra, J.
Plaintiff-appellee Ruby Sorci injured herself while working as a machine operator for defendant-appellant General Motors Corporation. After her claim for workers’ compensation benefits for lacerations and abrasions was filed, she filed a motion with the Industrial Commission for allowance of an additional condition due to aggravation of a pre-existing back condition and probable fracture of a right rib. This motion was granted by a district hearing officer. Appellant appealed to the Regional Board of Review and to the Industrial Commission to no avail. Appellant then appealed to the court of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kane v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Painter v. Midland Steel Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Powers v. City of North RoyaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sanford v. D & T Limousine Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996