Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Titsworth v. Nash

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application by John P. Titsworth, commissioner of highways of the town •of Groveland, for certiorari to Edwin A. Nash, county judge of Livingston ■county, to review an order made by him, confirming the report of commissioners appointed by him in proceedings to lay out a highway.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The .objection that certiorari will not lie to review the or■der in question is not well taken. The order is not a “determination which •can be adequately reviewed by an appeal to a court or to some other body or •officer.” Code Civil Proc. § 2122. The order is not one “made by a Court of record * * * or a judge thereof, in a special proceeding instituted in that court, or before a judge thereof, pursuant to a special statutory provision,” nor “instituted before another judge, and transferred to or continued before the judge who made the final order,”.(Id. § 1357;) and therefore an appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Higinbotham v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hanford v. ThayerNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People ex rel. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. County CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API