Legal Opinion

Lingo v. Phœnix Hermetic Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1924No. 15109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, 0. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer interposed to the original suit and the suit as amended. The demurrer, as clearly shown by its particular wording, was directed Solely against the original suit, and the amended suit was not subject to any ground of the demurrer, and the court properly so held. Nor was the allowance of the amendment error, since the procedure in the municipal court of Atlanta, in regard to pleadings, is the same as that of a justice’s court.

2. The admission in evidence of the original order signed by the defendant was not error for any reason…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cason v. Thomas Cheely & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Woodruff v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  3. Standard Coal Co. v. Eclipse Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Fay & Egan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. CUTLER-HAMMER INC. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API