Legal Opinion

Kentucky Employers Mutual Insurance v. Coleman

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2007No. 2006-SC-000608-MRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice NOBLE.

This appeal is before the Court from the denial of a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus by the Court of Appeals. Kentucky Employers Mutual Insurance (KEMI) sought the writ to bar further circuit court proceedings on a tort action related to a workers’ compensation claim, arguing that the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act barred that court from exercising jurisdiction. Because the Court of Appeals erred as a matter of law in refusing to grant the writ, its order is reversed.

I. Background

Paul Tackett was injured at work…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Zurich Insurance Co. v. MitchellKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Buckley v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RekerKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph Hospital v. FryeKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. SteadmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Goldstein v. FeeleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SlusherKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hickey v. Gen. Elec. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API