Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal iii error from Criminal Court of Shelby County. J. J. DuBose, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Stanley Mitchell and James Washington have appealed in error from a joint conviction. for the larceny of twenty dollars, the money of Patton Walker, the prosecutor.

They seek a reversal upon three grounds: (1) Because the trial Judge refused them a continuance; (2) because he refused them a severance; (3) because the evidence, as they contend, does not sustain the verdict.

First. — The motion for continuance was properly disallowed, because not supported by an affidavit.

Second. — The application for a severance was properly disallowed for the same reason.

Third. — It is well established by the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DykesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. Baxter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  3. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. Brady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  5. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API