Legal Opinion

Lynette Harris v. Betty Ewens Quadracci, James Romenesko, Dennis M. Casey, Quad/creative, Incorporated, and David A. Fryxell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 15, 1995No. 94-2834PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

In this defamation action, Lynette Harris sought damages from James Romenesko, Dennis M. Casey, Betty Ewens Quadracci and Quad/Creative, Inc. for statements made in a Milwaukee Magazine article, entitled “Runaway Twin: Lynette Harris takes her biographer on a frightening journey.” The district court 1 granted summary judgment, dismissing Harris’ defamation claim. Harris appeals.

Harris raises three issues on appeal: (1) the district court erred in concluding that as a matter of law she was a limited purpose public figure under the New York Times “actual…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. WFAA-TV, Inc. v. McLemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. J. Robert Tierney v. Chet W. Vahle and Debbie OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Bay View Packing Co. v. TaffCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Cummins v. SUNTRUST CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Kaminske v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API