Legal Opinion
United States v. Aaron
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 20, 1951No. 208, Docket 21940PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
During the years 1941 and 1942, appellant Aaron and his stepson, appellant Freidus, were in partnership with their wives doing business in the city of New York under the firm name of Aaron Machinery Company. The partnership business, which was conducted by the appellants, was that of buying and selling second-hand machinery which was in great demand at that time, and the purchases and sales were extensive. Adequate books of account were kept but it was proved, without dispute, that not all of the receipts from sales were entered in them. Ordinarily, consecutively numbered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Gomila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp., John Ward, John Potter and Michael BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Joseph Omotunde FilaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Robert A. Woodring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.