Legal Opinion

United States v. Taulbee

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 26, 1990No. ACMR 8901354Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant contends that nothing in the record of trial establishes that his pretrial confinement was properly ordered or reviewed. We find that no such issues are raised in this case. Records showing a proper order into pretrial confinement and magisterial review need not be included in the record of trial under the current regulation. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 305(i)(6) [hereinafter R.C.M.]; Army Regulation 27-10, Legal Services: Military Justice, para. 9-5(b)(6) (16 Jan. 1989). Though advisable, failure of the trial…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HillU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. RiverasotoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API