Legal Opinion

Ethan Watson Borne v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 8, 2020No. 09-19-00094-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-19-00094-CR __________________ ETHAN WATSON BORNE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 221st District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-09-12373-CR __________________________________________________________________ OPINION Pro se Appellant Ethan Watson Borne appeals his conviction for the manufacture or possession of a controlled substance—lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)—with the intent to deliver, in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API