Legal Opinion

State v. Isaac

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 16, 2011No. SC05-2047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We previously granted review of Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), to resolve a certified conflict in the district courts regarding the applicability of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to re-sentencing proceedings which became final after Apprendi and Blakely issued where the conviction and the original sentence were final before they issued. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; State v. Isaac, 4 So.3d 677 (Fla.2009) (granting review). We resolved this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boardman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Dirk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API