Legal Opinion

Cary v. Koerner

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1910Published

Action by Thomas Cary against Hazel M. Koerner and another.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The charter of the city of Buffalo (Laws 1891, c. 105) was amended by chapter 384, Laws 1909, which provides:

“The holder * * * of any certificate of sale heretofore executed by the comptroller, instead of taking a conveyance of the property purchased, may recover the amount paid therefor as in such certificate mentioned * * * and for that purpose may maintain an action in the Supreme Court * * * to sell such real property.’’
“Nothing in this act contained shall be held to revive or validate any claim or demand, the enforcement of which is otherwise barred by lapse of time.”

Under this statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Boyd v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Beard v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People Ex Rel. Oakley v. . BleckwennNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Kentucky Central Railway Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API