Legal Opinion
In Re Murall, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 18, 1989No. 15-04493PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM THURMOND BISHOP, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before me on the debtor’s Motion for Extension of the Automatic Stay. Bankers First Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Bankers First”) in reply, objected to the relief sought. As set forth below, based upon the arguments of counsel and applicable law, the motion is denied.
FINDINGS OF FACTS
Bankers First initiated a lawsuit against, inter alia, Murall, Inc. (“Murall”), J. Hugh Ryall (“Ryall”), and H. Victor Murdaugh, Jr. (“Murdaugh”). The Complaint contained three causes of action. The first cause of action is for the foreclosure…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Delorean Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Otero Mills, Inc. v. Security Bank & Trust (In Re Otero Mills, Inc.)District Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AMA Management Corp. v. StrasburgerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- American Film Technologies, Inc. v. Taritero (In Re American Film Technologies, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1994
- Aron R Thompson and Nicole R ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Merritt Bros. v. Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992