Legal Opinion
Hendler & Murray v. Lambert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) to stay arbitration, the petitioners Hendler & Murray, and Jerome Murray appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the *443Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), entered July 17, 1987, as denied their motion for discovery, to recuse the court-appointed arbitrator, and to stay the arbitration proceeding.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The facts of this case are summarized in the companion decision and order concerning the petitioners’ appeal from the judgment of the same court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between Katz & BurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WernickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Hendler & Murray v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldsborough v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re FloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Weisz v. WeiszNew York Supreme Court · 2013