Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Town of Sargeant v. County of Mower
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1932No. 28,728PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer interposed to relators’ alternative writ of mandamus, the trial court certifying that the question was important and doubtful. Relators (respondents here) are the town of Sargeant and the members of the town board. The respondents below (appellants here) are the county of Mower and the members of its board of county commissioners. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as the town and the county.
The town sought by mandamus to compel the county to reconstruct a bridge situated on a town line road between it and the town of Dexter in said county.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hunter v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Chase v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Driscoll v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Bowen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Paff v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952